Eye Attendance Policy
Eye Attendance Policy
The East Hampton School Board continued to tackle revisions to the district’s attendance policy last week, with one board member asking for stricter overall language and another asking to change the policy to avoid what she says is a practice that penalizes elementary students.
At the heart of the issue are unexcused absences — often resulting from decisions parents make to plan vacations outside of the usual school breaks — and the debate over whether teachers should prepare packets containing assignments or study guides that outline the concepts that the student will miss.
Current elementary school policy states that, “As a staff we have agreed not to honor requests to provide assignments or make up work for students who are out of school illegally.”
However, Jackie Lowey, a board member, said there were instances where packets or study guides had in fact been provided. She suggested the elementary school policy be rephrased to mirror the language proposed for the middle school policy, which states: “Teachers are responsible for offering students a general outline of material that will be covered, and not specific assignments while the student is out during an unexcused absence or absences.”
Ms. Lowey called that wording “a fair balance.”
“I do think that there are reasons sometimes why parents make decisions that are somewhat beyond kids’ control,” she said, “and I just want to make sure that when that happens, the kids are not penalized for it.”
Beth Doyle, the John M. Marshall Elementary School principal, said she understood how it might be possible to perceive the policy as one that penalizes students. However, she said, “Giving the packet was sort of saying we’re condoning this, which we’re not.”
Ms. Doyle also used the example of providing a general outline of topics to a first-grade student, saying it would not be helpful.
“We could say we’re working on two-digit addition, but the way we’re teaching two-digit addition in math right now is very different from the way most of the parents have learned it,” she said. “Of course, you can speak to the teacher to find out what they’re working on this week. And the most important thing in elementary school is that you’re reading every night and studying your math facts.”
“It seems to be working,” Ms. Doyle added. “Parents understand. We did have a few people who changed their trips or shortened their trips when they realized the impact of missing even one day of school, especially in the lower grades.”
Christina DeSanti, vice president of the school board, suggested that some students’ unexcused absences may have an impact on other students’ learning experiences, for instance if a teacher spends a significant amount of time helping a student who was absent catch up with the rest of the class.
Rich Wilson, a board member, said he would like to see tougher overall wording in the new attendance policy, perhaps mirroring what he described as stricter language and more specific consequences outlined in policies set by top-performing districts like Jericho and Manhasset.
Jericho’s approach to attendance, which is published on its website, is “every day counts.” The school cites “an evidence-based belief that regular classroom attendance is directly related to student performance and understanding,” and says absences totaling more than 15 percent of the school year — or approximately 27 days in a 180-day school year — mean a student loses credit for those courses. Manhasset’s published policy is similar, spelling out a maximum of 28 days and saying “regular school attendance is a major component of academic success.”
East Hampton’s current policy caps unexcused absences at 19 per school year and says, “To be successful in school, students must be present in classes and must actively participate in learning activities. Even when specific work can be made up after an absence, the valuable time on task missed with lost classes may eventually affect the achievement of goals. . . .” Those with more than 19 unexcused absences “will be denied course credit,” according to the current policy. However, the proposed high school attendance policy would drop references to a specific number of unexcused absences.
Mr. Wilson said students need as much classroom time as they can get now that tougher academic standards are being mandated by state and federal policy. “People have to understand, with this new curriculum, it’s not just a matter of memorizing things for one day and passing the test. Everything builds,” he said.
The board tabled the discussion of attendance rules pending further changes by its policy review committee.
The school board also tabled discussion of a policy regarding guns on campus after Ms. Lowey pointed out that the wording, as proposed, did not specify shotguns as among the weapons prohibited on school grounds. The school attorney, Jonathan Heidelberger, agreed to find a way to change the language so that shotguns are clearly prohibited along with the other types of firearms.